A Tireless and Indefatigable Fighter for Hindu Human Rights
I have got as much right to do politics and participate with fearless gusto and enthusiasm in the democratic political process in India as the supremely corrupt and half literate Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi and her chamchas in the Minorities Commission of India. I assert my fundamental right to freedom of speech under the Indian Constitution and more importantly Freedom After Speech. I have no less right than the openly PARTISAN mass media in India-----both print and electronic—who function as whole-time paid agents and marketing managers of Sonia Congress Party to participate in acrimonious and controversial political debates and discussion. In short I have as much right as BARKHA DUTTS, VIR SANGHVIS, DILIP SARDESAIS, ARNAB GOSWAMIS, RAHUL KANWALS and other media worthies to express my views without fear or favour on various political issues too!
I strongly condemn those politicians, civil society members, journalists and other pseudo-secular, fundamentally anti-national citizens for launching a baseless tirade against Dr.Subramanian Swamy, President of the Janata Party and Former Union Minister for Law and Commerce for his most seminal and brilliant article titled 'How To Wipe Out Islamic Terror' which was published in DNA (Daily News Analysis)issue dated 14th July 2011. I view the recent moves and overtures of the Minorities Commission of India and the State Minorities Commission of Maharashtra to politically silence Dr.Subramanian Swamy as totally illegal and unconstitutional, a Sonia-sponsored assault on the fundamental right to freedom of speech and thought .
Dr.Subramanian Swamy has already succeeded magnificently at the level of the Supreme Court to prosecute the Former Union Telecom Minister A.Raja for his unprecedented and uncontrolled loot under the Himalayan 2G scam. It is also public knowledge that Dr.Subramanian Swamy has already sought the permission of the Prime Minister to prosecute both Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi and Union Home Minister P.Chidambaram under the Prevention of Corruption Act for their leading and stellar role in the loot of 2G Scam. According to Dr.Swamy, Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi and her family have been paid a kick-back of Rs.60,000 crores under the 2G spectrum scam and Union Home Minister P.Chidambaram has been paid a kick-back of Rs.5000 crores under the same 2G spectrum scam. These two have joined together to persecute and prosecute Dr.Subramanian Swamy using the instrumentalities of the Minorities Commission and the weak arm of the lapsing and collapsing Indian State.
While Sonia Gandhi can terrorise our Do Nothing, See Nothing and Say Nothing Impotent Prime Minister into denying the permission sought by Dr.Subramanian Swamy to prosecute her and Union Home Minster P. Chidambaram, yet both these political bandits know full well that they can never prevent him from taking the matter for final justice and adjudication to the Supreme Court of India. That is why they have combined against Dr.Subramanian Swamy. They also know that they can not deploy the Congress Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Congress Bureau of Insinuation (CBI), Congress Bureau of Incarceration (CBI) and Congress Bureau of Intimidation (CBI) to ruthlessly put down and silence Dr.Subramanian Swamy.
This desperate duo have publicly come out with a two-pronged political attack on Dr.Subramanian Swamy.
1) Make maximum pseudo-secular political capital out of a very timely, relevant and brilliant article written by Dr.Subramanian Swamy in the DNA newspaper on 14th July, 2011 on how to effectively combat Islamic Terrorism. Some Congress oriented journalists have been purchased to write articles attacking Dr.Subramanian Swamy for having hurt the feelings and sensibilities of Minorities. Simultaneously the National Minorities Commission has been informally directed by Sonia Gandhi to somehow prosecute Dr.Subramanian Swamy under Section 153 of the IPC. The whole of India knows that that Section 153 of the IPC has never been used against the Imam of Jamma Masjid for his inflammatory statements from time to time against the majority Hindu community in India. No action has been taken against Arundhati Roy for extending open political support to the Kashmiri Separatists and terrorists at a public meeting in New Delhi and several such meetings elsewhere in different parts of India. Sonia Gandhi and P.Chidambaram believe in the RULE OF MEN NOT THE RULE OF LAW.
2) Dr.Subramanian Swamy is an outstanding Economist, having taken his Phd Degree from Harvard University 45 years ago under the supervision of Noble Laureates like Paul Samuelson and Simon Kuznets. He has been a very popular Visiting Professor in Harvard University for several years. In order to defame him and to terminate his employment as Visiting Professor there, Sonia Congress party has set up some leftist and Fundamentalist Islamic Groups in USA to write to the Harvard University authorities to terminate his employment as Visiting Professor on the ground that he is a fundamentalist Hindu. Sonia Gandhi and her Congress Party should know that the Harvard University in USA ca not be twisted and manipulated to serve their base if not wholly criminal political needs in the same way as Darul Uloom in Deoband or Jamia Milia University in New Delhi. The game being played by Sonia Gandhi in USA will be dealt with by ne in a more detailed manner in Part II of this article.
I am giving below the full text of Dr.Subramanian Swamy's article.
How to Wipe Out Islamic Terror
The problem can be solved in five years if the country learns its lessons with a 'virat' Hindu mindset to take bold, hard decisions.--Subramanian Swamy
The terrorist blast in Mumbai on July 13, 2011, requires decisive soul-searching by the Hindus of India. Hindus cannot accept to be killed in this halal fashion, continuously bleeding every day till the nation finally collapses. Terrorism I define here as the illegal use of force to overawe the civilian population to make it do or not do an act against its will and well-being.
Islamic terrorism is India's number one problem of national security. About this there will be no doubt after 2012. By that year, I expect a Taliban takeover in Pakistan and the Americans to flee Afghanistan. Then, Islam will confront Hinduism to "complete unfinished business". Already the successor to Osama bin laden as al-Qaeda leader has declared that India is the priority target for that terrorist organisation and not the USA.
Fanatic Muslims consider Hindu-dominated India "an unfinished chapter of Islamic conquests". All other countries conquered by Islam 100% converted to Islam within two decades of the Islamic invasion. Undivided India in 1947 was 75% Hindu even after 800 years of brutal Islamic rule. That is jarring for the fanatics.
In one sense, I do not blame the Muslim fanatics for targeting Hindus. I blame Hindus who have taken their individuality permitted in Sanatana dharma to the extreme. Millions of Hindus can assemble without state patronage for the Kumbh Mela, completely self-organised, but they all leave for home oblivious of the targeting of Hindus in Kashmir, Mau, Melvisharam and Malappuram and do not lift their little finger to help organise Hindus. If half the Hindus voted together, rising above caste and language, a genuine Hindu party would have a two-thirds majority in parliament and the assemblies.
The first lesson to be learnt from the recent history of Islamic terrorism against India and for tackling terrorism in India is that the Hindu is the target and that Muslims of India are being programmed by a slow reactive process to become radical and thus slide into suicide against Hindus. It is to undermine the Hindu psyche and create the fear of civil war that terror attacks are organised.
Hindus must collectively respond as Hindus against the terrorist and not feel individually isolated or, worse, be complacent because he or she is not personally affected. If one Hindu dies merely because he or she was a Hindu, then a bit of every Hindu also dies. This is an essential mental attitude, a necessary part of a virat (committed) Hindu.
We need a collective mindset as Hindus to stand against the Islamic terrorist. The Muslims of India can join us if they genuinely feel for the Hindu. That they do I will not believe unless they acknowledge with pride that though they may be Muslims, their ancestors were Hindus. If any Muslim acknowledges his or her Hindu legacy, then we Hindus can accept him or her as a part of the Brihad Hindu Samaj (greater Hindu society) which is Hindustan. India that is Bharat that is Hindustan is a nation of Hindus and others whose ancestors were Hindus. Others, who refuse to acknowledge this, or those foreigners who become Indian citizens by registration, can remain in India but should not have voting rights (which means they cannot be elected representatives).
Any policy to combat terrorism must begin with requiring each and every Hindu becoming a Virat Hindu. For this, one must have a Hindu mindset that recognises that there is Vyaktigat Charitra (personal character) and Rashtriya Charitra (national character). For example, Manmohan Singh has high personal character, but by being a rubber stamp of a semi-literate Sonia Gandhi and waffling on all national issues, he has proved that he has no Rashtriya Charitra.
The second lesson for combating terrorism is that we must never capitulate or concede any demand, as we did in 1989 (freeing five terrorists in exchange for Mufti Mohammed Sayeed's daughter Rubaiya) and in 1999, freeing three terrorists after the hijack of Indian airlines flight ic-814.
The third lesson is that whatever and however small the terrorist incident, the nation must retaliate massively. For example, when the Ayodhya temple was sought to be attacked, we should have retaliated by re-building the Ram Temple at the Site.
According to bleeding heart liberals, terrorists are born or bred because of illiteracy, poverty, oppression, and discrimination. They argue that instead of eliminating them, the root cause of these four disabilities in society should be removed. This is rubbish. Osama bin laden was a billionaire. In the failed Times Square episode, failed terrorist Shahzad was from a highly placed family in Pakistan and had an MBA from a reputed us university.
It is also a ridiculous idea that terrorists cannot be deterred because they are irrational and willing to die. Terrorist masterminds have political goals and a method in their madness. An effective strategy to deter terrorism is to defeat those political goals and to rubbish them by counter-terrorist action. Thus, I advocate the following strategy to negate the political goals of Islamic terrorism in India.
GOAL 1: OVERAWE INDIA ON KASHMIR.
Strategy: Remove article 370 and resettle ex-servicemen in the valley. Create Panun Kashmir for the Hindu Pandit community. Look for or create an opportunity to take over POK. If Pakistan continues to back terrorists, assist the Baluchis and Sindhis to get their independence.
GOAL 2: BLAST TEMPLES, KILL HINDU DEVOTEES.
Strategy: Remove the Masjid In Kashi Vishwanath Temple and the 300 Masjids at other temple sites.
GOAL 3: TURN INDIA INTO DARUL ISLAM.
Strategy: Implement the uniform civil code, make learning of sanskrit and singing of Vande Mataram mandatory, and declare India a Hindu Rashtra in which non-Hindus can vote only if they proudly acknowledge that their ancestors were Hindus. Rename India Hindustan as a nation of Hindus and those whose ancestors were Hindus.
GOAL 4: CHANGE INDIA'S DEMOGRAPHY BY ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION, CONVERSION, AND REFUSAL TO ADOPT FAMILY PLANNING.
Strategy: Enact a national law prohibiting conversion from Hinduism to any other religion. Re-conversion will not be banned. Declare that caste is not based on birth but on code or discipline. Welcome non-Hindus to re-convert to the caste of their choice provided they adhere to the code of discipline. Annex land from Bangladesh in proportion to the illegal migrants from that country staying in India. At present, the northern third from Sylhet to Khulna can be annexed to re-settle illegal migrants.
GOAL 5: DENIGRATE HINDUISM THROUGH VULGAR WRITINGS AND PREACHING IN MOSQUES, MADRASSAS, AND CHURCHES TO CREATE LOSS OF SELF-RESPECT AMONGST HINDUS AND MAKE THEM FIT FOR CAPITULATION.
Strategy: propagate the development of a Hindu mindset.
India can solve its terrorist problem within five years by such a deterrent strategy, but for that we have to learn the four lessons outlined above, and have a Hindu mindset to take bold, risky, and hard decisions to defend the nation. If the Jews could be transformed from lambs walking meekly to the gas chambers to fiery lions in just 10 years, it should not be difficult for Hindus in much better circumstances (after all we are 83% of India), to do so in five years.
Guru Gobind Singh showed us how just five fearless persons under spiritual guidance can transform a society. Even if half the Hindu voters are persuaded to collectively vote as Hindus, and for a party sincerely committed to a Hindu agenda, then we can forge an instrument for change. And that is the bottom line in the strategy to deter terrorism in a democratic Hindustan at this moment of truth.
(The writer is president of the Janata party, a former union minister, and a professor of economics.)
Dr.Subramanian Swamy has as much right—Political, Constitutional, Legal, Social, Cultural and Religious Right—to propose or suggest stern measures to be taken by the Government and the people and Society at large to put down Islamic Terrorism in India. If Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi can talk about Right Wing Saffron Terrorism, if her chamchas like union Home Minister Pa Chidambaram, Digvijay Singh (an open champion of Islamic terrorism), Abhishek Singvi, Manish Tiwari, Jayanti Natarajan and Janardan Diwedi can make baseless attacks on the RSS which is essentially a cultural organization, if the Imam of Jamma Masjid can rant and rave against the singing of Vande Mataram and make out a case for the return of India to Mughal Rule, It is Dr.Subramanian Swamy's inalienable, indivisible, inexorable and immutable birthright to write the article on the combating of Islamic Terrorism in the style, manner and measure he wrote in the DNA issue dated 14th July 2011.
No comments:
Post a Comment